Archive for the ‘Teams’ Category

Everyone is Dealing with Something

Saturday, February 2nd, 2013

Stephen Covey really got it right by emphasizing, “Seek first to understand, then to be understood.”    Through my coaching I would categorize a majority of the workplace challenges and stressors as two individuals (or groups) with misaligned expectations.  My advice is always the same:  “That person is probably dealing with something you aren’t aware of, so understand where they’re coming from, and then, and only then, help them understand your point of view.”  That is the only way to influence someone so that they willingly commit to your point of view.  It sounds so simple, but it’s obviously one of the hardest parts of working collaboratively, because teamwork is more critical than ever.

One of the reasons executives aren’t able to execute strategy and move their organizations from excellent to extraordinary is because those that need to support and carry out the strategy weren’t involved in helping create the strategy.  Not helping people find their place in the vision and the strategy (their purpose for commitment) is the root cause of team dysfunction.  A recent University of Phoenix survey found that 95% of people said teams serve an important purpose, but only 24% prefer to work on a team.  Logically and rationally, we know an effective team can be extremely rewarding experience.  We know teams are capable of accomplishing far greater things than one individual, yet we allow our emotions to get the best of us.  We get angry with others because they let us down.  The anger comes from perceived injustices, conflict, humiliation, negligence or betrayal.  We usually respond in classic fight or flight:  We lash out and attack, or we withdraw and sulk.  Neither response improves collaboration, job satisfaction, or personal fulfillment.

People support what they help create.   It’s that simple, but leaders are hanging on to outdated “command and control” practices, where only they know what’s best because they have “the big picture.”  Management strategy alone is no longer adequate, because artful leadership is required for effective execution and accelerating results.  Leaders must become teachers and engage the entire organization in helping craft strategic imperatives and prerequisites.

I don’t come across many organizational challenges that are truly unique.  Solutions don’t involve being more innovative, developing competitive matrices, or creating the most clever strategy.  Leading is simple, but extremely hard, because it involves a myriad of variables that revolve around human emotions and plenty of irrational and illogical behavior.  Rather than focusing on interpersonal skills and “communicating” more effectively, leaders can accelerate their organization’s growth by involving others in initiatives that improve the organization’s overall effectiveness.  As a math problem, it would simply be, E=Q*A (E – Effectiveness, Q-Quality, A – Acceptance).

Assuming everyone is dealing with something – some adversity, some crucible, some trying time – it’s important to keep help others keep a perspective on the big scheme of things.

After seeing a photo of earth taken in 1990 by the Voyager 1 spacecraft from a distance of 3.7 billion miles, Carl Sagan wrote about the Pale Blue Dot that is our planet.  I believe his primary intent was to underscore our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another:

“Look again at that dot. That’s here. That’s home. That’s us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every “superstar,” every “supreme leader,” every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there-on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.

 The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner, how frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot.”

How are you guiding people to the source of their own power to collaboratively and heroically lead your organization?

 

 

 

 

No Trust – No Leadership

Sunday, December 2nd, 2012

 

During the past week, my students have been discussing the challenge of leading virtual teams, and the prerequisite that came up most was trust.  There seems to be a perception that leaders have trouble trusting remote workers, and long before Lencioni wrote a book on the Five Dysfunctions of a Team, we knew that absence of trust leads to team dysfunction.  A student in my class asked if trust has to be earned, or whether it should given in order to be received.  I have often said that a lot of bad behavior at work is from some level of insecurity, and not trusting your team reflects more on the leader than the team.

William Glasser, author of Choice Theory®, eloquently described relationships and habits that are closely aligned with building trust:

Seven Caring Habits

  • Supporting
  • Encouraging
  • Listening
  • Accepting
  • Trusting
  • Respecting
  • Negotiating differences

Seven Deadly habits

  • Criticizing
  • Blaming
  • Complaining
  • Nagging
  • Threatening
  • Punishing
  • Bribing or rewarding to control

It’s hard to imagine any of the caring habits described above are not dependent on active listening as the baseline competency/habit.  Attached is a video mini-lecture I delivered to my team on the subject, and I’m interested in your thought on how trust is earned in today’s complicated and virtual environments?

Entrepreneurial Encore

Sunday, September 23rd, 2012

A year and a half ago, I was at lunch with two people I have immense respect for – past guest lecturers in the class I teach on leadership at the University of Colorado Denver.  We were sharing stories of the challenges we faced as leaders in an assortment of roles, when the senior member at the table said, “We have a tremendous amount of insight and experience to offer towards the development of future leaders.  The heck with being best in the world, let’s figure out a way to leverage our strengths and talents to be best for the world.”  His statement was the catalyst that created the J3 Leadership Group, LLC where we now help build extraordinary organizations… one leader, one team at a time.  Our primary tenet is to help senior leaders align heroic aspirations across their organization to accelerate change and drive growth by building on core strengths to create unity of purpose and alignment.  We do not offer paint-by-numbers solutions, but require leaders to take on the dual role of student and teacher

At a time when many boomers are seeking encores for their careers, we took a hard look at which entrepreneurs were seeing success.  Much to our surprise, a recent Forbes article pointed out that, “Vivek Wadhwa, a Duke University researcher worked with the Kauffman Foundation in 2009 to explore the anatomy of a successful startup founder. That survey of more than 500 startups in high-growth industries showed that the average founder of a successful company had launched his or her venture at the surprisingly high age of 40. The study also found that people over 55 are almost twice as likely to launch high-growth startups than those aged 20 to 34.”  I personally believe it depends on the type of the venture; the passion, experience and skills of the founders, and the ability to pair with those that have complementary skills.

To this end, the J3 Leadership Group has created a very unique offering by pairing with a highly successful strategic branding company, and a unique sales and business development practice focused on helping C-level executives connect for fruitful B2B relationships.  *What we know is that driving organic growth while maintaining profitability is a difficult balancing act (and a source of pain in most organizations), so our partnership will combine brand and sales expertise along with an operational leadership approach to create the Sustena Group.  The three disciplines under one umbrella offer a unique approach to help senior leaders align and accelerate three interrelated and essential business functions – brand development, business development and leadership development.

We look forward to sharing what we learn by helping leaders, teams and organizations realize their full potential and deliver the encore performance their stakeholders expect.

Purpose Drives HPT – High Performing Team

Sunday, August 19th, 2012

Last week I wrote about a new venture I’m starting and how fortunate I am to be associated with a great team.  Last week, I had the opportunity to see a great team in action: Panther Racing led by John Barnes.  I had the opportunity to ride in a two-seater with Arie Luyendyk, Jr, and what impressed me most wasn’t the ride, it was how hands-on the entire team seemed to be with every aspect of the business.  From the owner to a twenty-something PR person, the team was focused and committed to racing, winning, and representing their number-one sponsor – the National Guard.

The purpose of the event was to raise awareness for employers through a program sponsored by Panther Racing, Colorado ESGR, and Hiring Our Heroes.  It was a first-class event, and the mission never waivered from helping employer executives understand what citizen soldiers endure, and how tough a time they’re having finding employment after deployments.  It’s great to see a team that’s optimized and energized, and even better when a major part of their purpose is truly a higher calling.  As Medal of Honor recipient Dakota Meyer was quoted in Parade today, let’s get the word out to insure our soldiers have the opportunity to be part of another great team when they come home.

Getting Back Up

Sunday, April 15th, 2012

I had the good fortune to spend time with the West Point Cycling team again this weekend.  The best part wasn’t that Army won the men’s and women’s ECCC A-Division circuit race on their home turf.  The best part was watching the camaraderie of the team, and seeing that nothing could keep the team down.  Despite crashes and mechanical issues, the focus was always on getting back in the race and competing.  The complete focus was on the team, and completing the race. Even with road rash, stomachaches, colds, and a hairline fracture to a hip, concern for self took a backseat to the needs of the team.  It’s inspiring to see individuals give it their all for the sake of the sport, and the pride of their team.

“Our greatest strength lies not in never failing, but in rising each time we fall.”  –Ralph Waldo Emerson

Team Dynamics at West Point – A Shared Experience

Monday, October 4th, 2010

I am currently engaged with graduate students studying leadership and team dynamics, so presented with the opportunity, I jumped at the chance to ride with the West Point Cycling Team.  I couldn’t imagine a better opportunity to observe a collegiate team in action than to spend two hours riding with them while they’re doing what they do.  In fact, I can’t imagine too many college sports where someone of a certain age could intimately participate without risking serious bodily injury!

As we were preparing to ride, the team assembled in the basement of Cullum Hall – one of those ancient, granite fortresses along the Hudson River.  The basement was pretty dingy and damp, but what I noticed most was how quiet the team was as we assembled on a cool autumn morning.  The team came to work, and approached their preparation very methodically.  Pre-ride preparation means lowering the chance of mechanical failures, being properly fueled, and having the right layer of clothes to stay comfortable.  This preparation is as much selfish as it is for the team.  Getting stuck on the side of the road, or falling off the back will mean the team waits, and diminishes the training objective and effect.

As we started the ride, the team captain announced the route – a two hour ride with some hills.  “Some hills” turned out to be nearly 2,000 feet of climbing.  The team was outfitted in black and gold kits, and it was with great pride that I rode off post towards the hills with about fifteen of our nation’s best and brightest.  As we warmed up, the good natured jokes started immediately.  There was a quote from a British officer who recently visited West Point and told the cadets their institution was basically a “Mensa prison” disguised as a college.  There were also announcements of nicknames and self-deprecating jokes that established the tenor of the ride, and served to set performance expectations.  In case I couldn’t tell from body types, I got a quick run-down on the climbers, sprinters, and track racers.    At the same time, the dynamics of the team came alive.

“Dynamic” can be characterized by energy, force, or power – especially one that motivates.  And this team dynamic was immediately on full display.  To the untrained eye, cycling might not seem to be a team sport, but the physics of velocity deem tactics of strategic importance.  The trash talk gave way as the slope of the road increased, and the physical leaders emerged as the pace increased.  As the position of riders in the group ebbed and flowed, I realized that the team had created equilibrium of competition and collaboration.  The average rider on the team is about 20 years old, and somehow two months into their training season they had formed, stormed (I assume), normed, and were now performing quite well.  For an institution known for its rigidity and hierarchy around command and control, I observed a very self-directed team.

The United States Military Academy often refers to their cadets as future leaders of America’s sons and daughters, and during the ride, I wondered what a business or non-profit team could learn from these emerging leaders.  For one, the tough selection process, especially in a time of war, means there is tremendous amount of homogeneity not usually found in today’s work teams.  But that’s now what I saw bringing the team together.  I saw a shared sense of purpose, a common vision for the future, and a commitment to not let the team down by giving anything less than one-hundred percent effort.  In essence, there was a shared objective, a shared commitment, and a shared sacrifice.  The intrinsic reward is simply their place on the team, and a sense of belonging.  The only punishment I could envision would be not meeting the team’s expectations resulting in the loss of respect amongst one’s peers.

If your team can create a shared objective you’re half-way there.  The other more difficult half is figuring out how to create a shared commitment with a corollary sacrifice.  Getting buy-in on sacrifice is the hard part, because that means giving something up (e.g., time, other projects, etc.), and that represents change.  And change is something most people abhor.  Successful change occurs when motivations and rewards are aligned, and the inevitable “what’s in it for me” is much harder to calibrate on a diverse team.  But as they might say at West Point, leadership is not for sissies, and the reward is in the privilege of belonging to something bigger than oneself.

Article first published as Team Dynamics at West Point – A Shared Experience on Technorati.

Is your team compliant or committed?

Sunday, May 16th, 2010

I was cycling with a group of riders yesterday, and there were times when we were taking turns on the front to increase the pace while riding into the wind.  Most of us had ridden together before, and some of what we were able to do as a team was without anyone in particular demonstrating leadership.  It got me thinking about three major characteristics of an effective team:

  1. Shared accountability:  Everyone worked together on the ride and shared the work.
  2. A distinctive purpose:  We were trying to get from point A to point B as quickly as possible to push each other and ourselves.
  3. Real work:  Everyone had the same amount of work to do, and we were physically exerting ourselves for a purpose.

As the leader, think about the effectiveness of your teams:

  1. Is the accountability truly shared?  Are your team members empowered beyond a doubt?  Did you give up some measure of power and control?
  2. Does the team know their distinctive purpose?  Do they know where they’re going and why?
  3. Does the team exert themselves by doing mental work that’s aligned with your stated purpose?  Was the team involved in defining the purpose?  Is there alignment with the expected outcomes?

The key is shared accountability.  Now ask yourself, is your team truly committed to the purpose, or merely compliant?

Article first published as Is Your Team Compliant or Committed? on Technorati.

The Healthcare Summit and Team Size

Friday, February 26th, 2010

By most accounts, there was little progress at the President’s Healthcare Summit. I am not surprised. Not because of the political and policy differences on the intricacies of healthcare, but because of the size of the group. There were 40 people in that room, and multiple studies have shown that large teams are ineffective due to an inability to maintain focus. The size of a team is a major factor in a team’s performance. How big is your team?